To understand the importance of peer
reviewed articles, one must understand the risks involved with open source
media. Open source media is any websites, blogs, etc that are freely accessed
and/or free to be edited or added to without qualification. The most prominent example
is Wikipedia. Though the core values of Wikipedia are well intended, the way in
which they allow anyone to edit and add to their stockpile of information can
lead to many falsified claims. This is an issue across all forms of open source
media. This is where the importance of peer review comes into play. Oxford
dictionary defines peer review as “Evaluation of scientific, academic, or
professional work by others working in the same field.” (Oxford Dictionary,
2016) This statement alone does not quiet cover the full importance of this
matter and is better explained by Andre Spicer and Thomas Roulet in their
co-authored article for The Conversation named Explainer: what is peer review?
The article clearly states that “Peer review is
one of the gold standards of science. It’s a process where scientists (“peers”)
evaluate the quality of other scientists’ work. By doing this, they aim to
ensure the work is rigorous, coherent, uses past research and adds to what we
already knew.” (Spicer A, Roulet T, 2014) This statement perfectly portrays the
true definition of peer review. Given these statements, it is clear that the
importance of peer review is identify and acknowledge accurate information and
to acknowledge the work of the authors within their respective domain.
Spicer A, Roulet
T, 2014, ‘Explainer: what is peer review?’, The Conversation, viewed 29
November 2016, https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-is-peer-review-27797
Oxford Dictionaries English, 2016, “peer review - definition of peer
review in English’, Oxford Dictionaries, viewed 29 November 2016, https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/peer_review
No comments:
Post a Comment